In the national nightmare that has been upon us since November 8, 2016, the media have paid tons of attention to Trump voters and have given platforms to inside-the-Beltway pundits who today slam Trump but played a key role in enabling him. But when is the press going to interview the people who are most appalled at what's going on?
That would be the nearly 66 million Americans who voted for Hillary Clinton. Take it from us, while many people are up in arms about the vileness of this Presidency, no one is more apoplectic than we are.
But the media behave as if we don't exist. They're too busy genuflecting at the altar of the "Roseanne" cohort — never mind that millions of us turned out on the day after Inauguration Day for the biggest demonstration in US history. (Is it because reporters are worried that Trump voters will die of fentanyl overdoses before they can talk to them? Who knows?)
Heck, even when The Washington Post interviewed five voters for an article about 2018's expected blue wave, only one of them had marked a 2016 ballot for HRC. Maddening.
Remember the socialist peasant in "Monty Python & the Holy Grail" who yelled about violence inherent in the system? Well, there's bias inherent in the media. It's against Hillary Clinton, and it's against women in general. Why else do reporters not approach women and ask them how they feel about a whackjob religious minority trying to outlaw their Constitutional rights? It drives us cats crazy, and it makes us HISS.
No comments:
Post a Comment