Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Palin v. Palin

By Sniffles

You know, after eight years of a pseudo-President skating through on platitudes, we cats are hoping that America — and the media — will not fall for George W. Bush in a Skirt.

The nation's problems are too pressing, too complicated, and too far-reaching to be smoothed over by Miss Perfect Teeth Quoting Parroted Lines from Steve Schmidt. That's our ultimate reaction to the latest example of how Sarah Palin couldn't answer a question posed by Katie Couric.

How is it possible that Governor Palin couldn't cite a single, non-Roe-v.-Wade Supreme Court case she disagreed with — when she herself issued a statement against the Court decision on Exxon v. Baker?

We'll tell you why. Because Sarah Palin didn't write that statement, didn't approve it, probably didn't even know about it. Her staff took care of it all for her.

We cats aren't naive. We know that auto-pens sign letters to constituents, and that public servants have employees who handle a whole litter-boxload of stuff for them. That's just reality.

But we really, really, really don't want to have a clueless moron a heartbeat away from a Presidency held by a 72-year-old cancer patient.

As the clueless moron herself might say, "Thanks, but no thanks."

No comments: